02-27-2010, 05:54 PM
|
#2 |
| Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Northern California Posts: 435
| California went through this last year. Bottom line, closing them does save money. The government puts more money into the state parks than the parks bring in for the government. What that government failed to give a flip about is the countless dollars that people visiting the state parks bring into the local economy. Sure, a family visiting a state park might only spend $15 (or less) for a day-hiking or camping permit, but when that family goes out to dinner after their hike and drops $100 at one of the neighborhood restaurants is a real boost to the local economy. But, the government doesn't get that money, so they don't care about closing the parks. They just see the black-and-white of it ... not the endless gray area.
It's a shame really. It just shows they're willing to make the easy-on-them cuts, and not to any real work to balance their budgets.
It's idiotic, really.
|
| |