11-23-2012, 06:52 PM
|
#16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: SE Idaho Posts: 3,907
| Well, the shootee was wandering around the woods at eventide wearing camo clothes instead of hunter orange. (Make that wandering around peoples back yards) This will not let the shooter off the hook but it was sure stupid of the shootee in my opinion. The shooter was also wandering around at eventide with a loaded rifle, even though he had lost his glasses earlier in the day. (He too was wearing camo clothes, irrelevant but shows his stupidity as well.)
Both these jerks were hunting with high powered rifles with houses within a few yards. The rifle was a .270 which shoots a bullet that can travel miles and is deadly to 600 yards. In my opinion, the shooter should be charged with involuntary manslaughter at the least. And my sympathy for the shootee is not very deep either. I do have deep sympathy for his family and my prayers go out to them.
The shootee was actually in the backyard of the lawyer that is going to try and defend the shooter. Very convenient, the lawyer didn't have to chase the ambulance for this case. My sympathy is very low for these guys because their stupidity gives all hunters a black eye and gives the anti gun crowd a lot more ammunition for their cause. But just remember, 79,999,999 gun owners did NOt accidently or on purpose shoot someone that day.
Tentrus, various state laws may let you own a shotgun or rifle without a license but to use them you have to have a license and all states require a hunter safety course to get that license. Obviously, these guys had a poor hunter safety instructor.
If PRO is the opposite of CON, what is the opposite of Progress?
Your beliefs do not make you a better person, your behavior does. |
| |